PASSERELLE
Source : newsletter de www.nuitd'orient.com
diffusée le 21 septembre



Confrontation Israël/Iran
à l'AIEA (Agence internationale pour l'énergie atomique)


En une rare et amère confrontation, l'Iran demande à la communauté internationale d'expédier des inspecteurs pour contrôler l'activité nucléaire d'Israël qui accuse l'Iran de proférer des menaces génocidaires et de mentir en permanence.
Jeudi dernier, par 53 voix pour et 2 voix contre (Usa et Israël) et 47 abstentions la conférence de l'AIEA demande à Israël de mettre son programme nucléaire sous supervision internationale.
Vendredi dernier, à une grande majorité (l4Iran a voté contre) la conférence augmente les pouvoirs de l'agence pour éviter la prolifération des armes nucléaires.

Alors que par ailleurs on apprend que des commandos israéliens (Sayeret Matkal), ont démantelé un site nucléaire syrien le 6 septembre 2007, construit sous l'égide des Nord-Coréens, sur technologie vendue par le Pakistanais Khan. Des Nord Coréens et des Syriens seraient morts dans cette destruction, coordonnée avec les Etats-Unis.



Iran, Israel clash at IAEA conferenceVIENNA, Austria- Sep 22, 2007 Israel accused Iran of lying Friday while Teheran challenged the international community to send UN inspectors to probe its arch-rival's nuclear capabilities, in a rare and unusually bitter direct confrontation.
Iran's Ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Ali Asghar Soltanieh.
UN officials at a 148-nation meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency said they had no memory of the two hostile nations ever engaging each other directly at previous meetings and said that development - and the unusually harsh tone of their statements - in part reflected Middle East tensions.
The exchange came after Iran's chief delegate Ail Asghar Soltanieh - like Arab delegates before him - said that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had acknowledged last year that his country possessed nuclear weapons - something Olmert says he never did.
Soltanieh also criticized "the continuous silence of the US ... vis-a-vis the atrocities, aggression, bloodshed and violations of over 30 resolutions of the United Nations."
That, he said, is "shameful and [a] dark point in the history of the United Nations, and the IAEA and the modern century at large."
In turn, Israeli delegate Israel Michaeli, alluding to claims that Olmert acknowledged Israel's nuclear weapons, said some previous speakers "continued to lie."
"Those who call for the elimination of Israel have no moral standing when they criticize Israeli policies aimed at defending Israel's very existence," Michaeli said.
Soltanieh then challenged the IAEA to send its inspectors into Israel "to verify who is telling the truth."
The harsh words came after an attempt by Iran and Arab nations to submit a resolution on "Israel Nuclear Capabilities and Threat" was blocked by the EU, the United States and other Western nations.
While the conference has enforcement powers, it has been increasingly politicized over the past decade by the Middle East dispute and more recently by Iran's nuclear ambitions.
Israel's doctrine of "nuclear ambiguity" - never formally confirming or denying that it has such weapons - is meant to scare potential enemies from considering an annihilating attack while denying them the rationale for developing their own nuclear deterrent.
Olmert caused a stir late last year with a remark he made to a German TV station, which was widely interpreted as confirming Israel has nuclear weapons. Olmert said he had been misunderstood.
On Thursday, the conference criticized Israel for refusing to put its nuclear program under international purview, with the United States alone in supporting the Jewish state.
Israel also voted against the resolution, while 53 nations backed it and 47 abstained. The remaining nations were absent for the highly unusual vote - only the second in the 16 years the issue has been on the agenda of the IAEA conference.
On Friday, a resolution that in part sought to expand IAEA powers to prevent nuclear proliferation passed by a comfortable margin, though Iran was among the nonaligned states voting against it.